Abstract:
In this publication, an example is presented of religious fundamentalism and a call for peace, to eliminate pollution and hatred and keep Earth the galactic vacation planet it is, this is delineated in the vacation theology. Karmic theology is refuted as a fundamentalist theory of bigotry, with different other theologies, like the washing machine theology and vacation theology. An expansion of consciousness analogous to stochastic and quantum metaphors is called for, as an escape from classicism. Keywords: stochastic theories, quantum theories, classicalism, work theology, vacation theology,washing machine theology, Judaism, Godel's incompleteness theorem, Indology, anti-hate propaganda,anti-fundamentalism propaganda. What:Fundamentalism is a dangerous scenario, amongst the warring tribes model of religion(“Website” n.d.).Much rhetoric is wasted on fundamentalist territory, an example from a recent dialog on religion is presented in this paper to illustrate this hate campaign.How:The words ‘duty’ and ‘dharma’ are misaligned , contrived and twisted in their ontological and taxonomic interpretations. Much literature is devoted to this subject in many theologies, under different names and taxonomies. Karmic theory is disproved as incomplete and just one of the many spiritual technologies of the Grand Biodiversity Theory, a theory that states that religion and spirituality are like biodiversity and language, as diverse as creation itself, with its own tower of babel, that humanity will always disagree and war over both religion and language. Why: Hate like pollution is omnipresent in this realm of creation, like mitigating pollution, is the need to deweed fundamentalism, the need to remove hatred from the surface. Summary: Main Points: ●Warring Tribes model of Religions. ●Grand Biodiversity Theory is defined. ●Fundamentalist Karmic Theory of Indology, is refuted with an antithesis of Judaism, Washing Machine Theology and the Indigenous Vacation Theology Link to paper.
0 Comments
11/24/2019 0 Comments Godel's God: A SummaryAbstract:
This paper is on Godel’s proof of God and it’s incompleteness. A proof of God as presented by Godel is described, with the incompleteness or extensions to a absolute-relative definition in asymptotic. It is argued that like the wheel and propeller, God and Religions are an invention of man and must exist for faith as a grace or super-naturalism in a multi-universe setting. Keywords: Godel’s Proof, Incompleteness, absolute-relative, ontological definitions, higher order logic, asymptotic definitions, Namespaces, Taxonomy. Core thesis of Godel: God is defined in higher order modal logic as being of positives, in many worlds and there being a not greater than in the definition of God. Godel’s proof starts with the proof that there exists one such God in some world and then goes to prove that there must exist such a God in every world. What: A proof of the multiverse nature of the universe and god as ontological proof of existence is proven in this ontological proof of God by Godel. The proof uses modal logic and proves the existence of God. The author proposes, the addition of the infinity and the asymptotic to the proof, to expand the proof to the vast taxonomy and form prevalent in present theology. How: A minimum viable theology is defined, "There not be a greater than God for any Namespace NN of the defined God and any manifold MM defined as a representation of the God. All elements of NN are equivalent to each other and the many names of God. A channel of faith can be established towards MM as worship of God. The concept of God can be defined as a state of consciousness, internal to man as God realization. That this state should be a transcendence of the normal states of consciousness. That this state could be attributable to a supernatural entity. " And an incompleteness: "Incompleteness: God must define a singularity, of a bounded infinity, an asymptotic to an entity in many worlds that has no greater than from a monotonic ordering to an infinity. For any such modal in any world, there must exist asymptotic to a God entity. Map M : Modal A -> F(A, X) => G(A) There must be a computable representation albeit incomplete in monotonic entities of the God entity, in semantics of name and form. Let the Namespace be NN, and the Manifold MM, MM belongs to X, then F(A,X) is equivalent to: There exists, one or more channels, Ci, such that G(Ci, NN, MM) => G(A) There must be schemes for the existence of ascension to the God entity in other worlds. There must be ‘universal’ properties to this God entity. " So What: God is proven in formal ontology, and naturalness is imminent. Why: The agnostic is just as appealing in Comparative Theology as a theist, this publication create a spectrum in theism, with a theoretical analysis of the Biodiversity Of Theologies,(Bheemaiah 2019,) a mathematical work proving the existence of a vast spectrum of diversities of theologies. Read The Paper Here Bheemaiah, A., Dr. (2019, October 31). Godel's God. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/pn4r9 11/24/2019 0 Comments WelcomeWelcome, to the Theological Blog, on Yogic Church:
In this blog, I will link several theological papers in contemporary Christology, Comparative Theology and in Trans-Humanism, supplemented with a nutritional supplement of strong animal rights, aspecism, naturalism, earth ministry, and strong A.I philosophies. |
AuthorThe author is an A.I think tank, a member of the trans-humanist christian association, a minimalist and the founder of the trans humanist Buddhist spirituality of Shambhala, a non warriors path. ArchivesCategories |